"The main reason to obtain this recording is that this is the version premiered in St. Petersberg in 1862, with many differences from the more familiar 1869 revision.
1 - The prelude is mostly the same as the first few minutes of the overture. After the melody from Leonora's Act II aria, the remaining music is from the very end of the opera, when Alvaro commits suicide.
2 - Act I is mostly the same, except for the passage where Leonora tries to convince Alvaro to delay their elopement. It is quite lyrical, but not quite as dramatic as the revision. Also, a few small differences in the vocal line of the duet are noticeable.
3 - In Act II, Scene 1, Preziosilla's solo is in B flat rather than B, and it does not lead directly into the prayer that follows, as it does in the revision.
4 - Leonora's duet with Padre Guardiano in Act II, Scene 2, has several differences, most notably the passage where she begs him not to send her to a cloister. Overall this scene sounds like a less refined version of the end result.
5 - In Act III, Scene 1, Carlo's aria is in F, rather than E.
6 - The two portions of Scene 2 are in the opposite order, the camp scene preceding the duet. There are several portions of the camp scene where the feel of the music is similar, but the actual content is different. The dawn patrol chorus is not in this version. The duet between Carlo and Alvaro does not yet have the introduction for Alvaro alone; the two men appear to enter together after meeting for the first time since "Solenne in quest'ora." Otherwise, there are two passages which would later be cut, one of which takes Alvaro to a high C. The final version is tighter and less taxing on the singers, but the original is still extremely exciting. After the duet, the rest of the act is entirely different, consisting of an orchestral depiction of the duel followed by Alvaro's aria where he is horrified at apparently killling Carlo. Again, this is a very taxing passage, ending on a high C, but extremely exciting.
7 - In Act IV, Scene 1, Melitone's scene with the beggars is occasionally different, yet always similar in character to the revision. Carlo's solo passage before Alvaro's entrance is much shorter and less satisfying than "Invano Alvaro," but the duet itself is the same.
8 - In the final scene, very little of the music after Leonora's aria was retained. There is a brief duet passage for the reunited lovers leading to Leonora's murder by Carlo. She sings a brief, affecting death scene before the monks enter and Alvaro throws himself off the cliff to music heard in the prelude. It is certainly a much more grim, less cathartic ending than the revised version.
This performance is a very satisfying one, if not quite on the same level as many of the recordings of the 1869 version. If you can find it, there is also a recording of this version released in 1997 by Gergiev and what is essentially a Russian cast. While it is a bit more polished than this recording, the singers tend to be less idiomatic than the singers featured here."
Glorious...
Nancy Eckert | Bellefontaine, OH USA | 01/18/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
".... simply glorious.
Martina Arroyo is Leonora to perfection. I'm very fond of Leontyne Price, but Arroyo is better (if you'll excuse the comparison). Her voice just soars, her diction is perfect and she's very musical.
The surprise was the production. I didn't expect much and I was bordering on stunned and, particularly, with Kenneth Collins, about whom I knew nothing. (There are other very familiar names, but this tenor was a complete surprise. I've tried to find a bit of bio to no avail. If anyone can direct me, I'd be happy with the information.)
Nancy Eckert"
Top of the class - no matter which version
Alan Montgomery | Oberlin, Oh USA | 09/10/2006
(4 out of 5 stars)
"I won't re-iterate the differences in the versions. Mr. Hess kindly did that already. But I want to praise the entire performance. Martina Arroyo, whose Met career faded too quickly, was a much underrated singer, and here she proves herself equal to Price or Callas. Whether high or low, she nails everything. Kenneth Collins had a very Italianate approach without resorting to stereotyped sobbing. His singing simply floored me, making me wonder why we didn't hear more of him. I wish Peter Glossop had been replaced by someone else, as his voice, perfect for Billy Budd, here seems under pressure and not steady. His aria is better, but the first scene at the Inn is just not very steady. Where were the great Italian baritones when we needed them? All the other voices are quite good. Mathieson conducts an idiomatic performance which soars with spirit where some recordings of the revised version seem tame by comparison.
My only complaint (other than Mr. Glossop) is the price. That is a LOT of money for 3 CDs. And, even in the original version, the length is still just under 3 hours. The performance is worth even more stars, but the price will be very off-putting. 4 stars instead of 5 because of Glossop and the price gouging (a price not set by Amazon, I might add.)"
The best original version of Forza
Il Condottiero | 04/11/2007
(5 out of 5 stars)
"For those who want to walk on the wild side, try Verdi's original 1862 version used for the St. Petersburg grand premier. He was originally commissioned to write the opera for St. Pete's literati. He detested living in Russia for a year (there is a great picture of him bundled in hides and furs), imported tons of Italian sausages to gnaw on, and stretched the limits of the Italian language to express his displeasure (which makes sense, if you too grew up in Italy). Anyway, there is a great recording of the seldom-heard original on the enterprising Opera Rara label, with fine singing throughout."