"I was astounded to read several reviews critical of Klemperer's Pathetique, for a supposed lack of emotion. This recording originally came out (on vinyl) when I was a teenager, and immediately became my favorite in any genre. It so overwhelmed me emotionally that many nights I cried myself to sleep listening to it. And trust me, it takes a lot to make a teenage boy cry in a bedroom he shares with his brothers. I think it's one of the great recordings of all time (and I now own about 3,000 CD's)."
Unusual Tchaikovsky, great Schumann
Andrew R. Weiss | Raleigh, NC USA | 06/28/2003
(4 out of 5 stars)
"Klemperer's Tchaikovsky is an acquired taste. Tchaikovsky is emotional and sentimental. Klemperer may be emotional but sentimental, never. What Klemperer gives us is a Pathetique that pays more attention to the balance of details and overall architecture than to sentimentality and effect. The tempi are slow, as usual for Klemperer in this period of his life, but not waywardly so except in the third movement. Each movement builds inexorably to its climax, and the climaxes themselves are overwhelmingly intense, inexorable, made more effective by Klemperer's stubborn refusal to manipulate tempi and dynamics. The phrasing is loving, beautifully balanced throughout. This is a grim Pathetique, very powerful but not in the mainstream of Tchaikovsky interpretation. I find it one of my favorites, but then again, I am not a big fan of sentimental posturing. The Schumann is one of the best versions of that symphony I've ever heard. The textures are transparent, and Klemperer's awareness of the piece's overall structure lends it more coherence than in most performances. This is a virile and energetic reading, even given the relatively slow tempi. Klemperer works with Schumann's original orchestration, which some have called muddy, but because he is so careful and clear in delineating the lines and textures, all of the details are clear and balanced. I recommend this recording for the Schumann, and for the Tchaikovsky if you are open to a different point of view. The sound is suitable spacious in the Tchaikovsky and detailed, and lighter, in the Schumann."
Klemperer's Pathetique
Andrew R. Weiss | 12/30/2000
(5 out of 5 stars)
"klemperer once again convinced the listeners. He creates, builds up the tension from the beginning until the end at the Pathetique Symhony. The third movement is beautifully phrased and the last movement is very unsentimental and one really feels pathetique at the end, it is like a Kafka novel to be precise. Do not miss!"
Brucknerian Pathetique very unique!
Scriabinmahler | UK | 02/28/2007
(5 out of 5 stars)
"
Klemperer's Brucknerian rendition of Pathetique Symphony is very unique to say the least, and may sound wierd for those who are used to the mainstream account by Mravinsky, Ormandy, Karajan, Svetlanov etc.
He is more concious of structure of the work than dramatic representation of the work, and he brings out details and parts which are usually buried underneath leading voices. His positioning of orchestra is also very unusual with the 2nd violins on conductors right side apart from 1st violins, you can hear the two parts from both speakers distinctly.
1st and 3rd movement are most unusual, the last movement is more or less similar to conventional interpretation, but no less intense. If you admire Klemperer's uncompromising style and insight, it's well worth listening."
The Tchaikovsky Is an Acquired Taste.
L. Corso | Richmond, VA, USA | 03/12/2009
(4 out of 5 stars)
"The "Pathétique" Symphony on this record is beautifully recorded. However, Klemperer gives his usual idiosyncratic treatment and this may disturb those used to the usual sentimental handling of Tchaikovsky's music. This performance smecks of "objectivity," and is, of course, stern in tone throughout, with moderate to slow pacing. Certain quirks, such as the choice of tempo for the first movement development section as well as the entire third movement, may leave listeners scratching their heads. The symphony's heavy, wrenching emotions are often sacrificed for a raw (and occasionally dry) purity of expression -- I wouldn't say this is a disservice to the work, as there is still incredible power here.
The Schumann Fourth Symphony on this recording deserves less attention because it's excellent. I don't have a single negative thing to say about it."