"Segerstam's Sibelius will probably appeal more to those who appreciate a somewhat soft edged, relatively slower paced, more richly textured quality. In other words, if you like tauter, cleaner lines, a more vivid and energetic pace and a cooler interpretive style, then Segerstam may not be your man. There's no doubt he can be quite musically expressive, but the issue is in what way[s] ? One of the chief considerations with Sibelius is atmosphere. Aside from nature's colors playing a vital role, grandeur or an epic quality frequently demands representation. While Segerstam is capable of projecting a swelling sense of intensity when called for, I feel he doesn't reveal enough in the way of that Sibelian attribute of loftiness. However, the Sixth Symphony's recipe calls for a somewhat different set of ingredients. Though there are still aspects of the usual mystery and grandness, more flowing textures and some lighter considerations significantly come into play. Segerstam deals with these things in a most disarming way by bringing warmly expressive detail to what is often referred to as a wintry toned work. I do not rate him as highly however in the other symphonies...In the First, my main criticisms are along aesthetic grounds---his characterization of particular phrases, the prominence given to certain instrumental sections over others and some pauses that are too long...The popular Second Symphony is the kind of piece that runs the risk of being twisted and pulled excessively by some conductors. The worst case I'm familiar with is Thomas Schippers' New York Philharmonic account from the 1960s. Segerstam does not go that far, though I'm still not especially enamoured with his reading. Moreover, he does not entirely avoid some congestion. I also do not respond well to some of his heavier accents. My disappointment with his conception of the Fifth Symphony is based on similar grounds...I rate Segerstam's Third Symphony performance as being next best after his Sixth. It is nicely tuneful, although the final minutes of the last movement would have benefitted from a little more textural clarification...The conductor's perspective on the Seventh Symphony misses a taut, vivid quality. Musical lines could be cleaner. There's not much of that epic presence either...Finally, in the Fourth Symphony, Segerstam is appropriately dark and moody, but there has to be more evidence of life's vital signs. I find his pace too slow and his musical outline a bit spongy. Among other Fourths I have heard, Collins and Maazel are the best at grabbing my attention and keeping it throughout...As for Finlandia, it begins in fairly routine fashion though near the close there is a nice contribution from the Male Polytech Choir; however, they and Segerstam never really bring the piece to inspired heights...In the Violin Concerto the conductor's mostly plodding pace carries all the way to the end. Though technically fine, violinist Pekka Kuusisto doesn't project much personality. There seems to be little range or depth of feeling in his rendition.
Here are my favorite choices for these pieces, not necessarily in order of preference: Sym.1--Maazel/Vienna Philharmonic, Collins/London Symphony ( All of Collins' Sibelius readings are in mono.) and Stokowski/National Philharmonic; Sym.2--Ormandy/Philadelphia Orchestra ( Columbia/Sony ), Collins and Ashkenazy/Philharmonia Orchestra ; Sym.3--Kamu/Helsinki Radio Symphony and Segerstam/Helsinki Philharmonic; Sym.4--Maazel/Vienna and Collins; Sym.5--Bernstein/New York Philharmonic, Barbirolli/Halle Orchestra, Collins, Ashkenazy and Ormandy/Philadelphia Orch.(lp nla); Sym.6--Vanska, Collins, Saraste/Finnish Radio, Karajan/BerlinPhiharmonic on EMI, Ashkenazy and Segerstam/Helsinki Phil.; Sym.7--Maazel/Vienna, Vanska, Collins and Koussevitzky; Finlandia--Ormandy/Philadelphia ( with Mormon Tabernacle Choir ), Collins and Ashkenazy; Violin Concerto--Oistrakh/Ormandy, Heifetz/Hendl and Repin/Krivine. Incidentally, the recorded sound on Segerstam's Ondine set is very fine."
5 Stars for the Symphonies and Finlandia!
Woodland Poet | 06/12/2007
(5 out of 5 stars)
"If you have loved the Sibelius Symphonies as I have and have been searching for the one set to buy, this is that set. A Finnish conductor and orchestra make it all the better. The recorded sound is amazingingly clear and deep. The performances are rich, detailed and have a great urgency to them. There is I would say a tension to the performaces and excitement and more warmth than so much of the "icy" Sibelius that is out there on CD. The second is taken at a slower pace than some, but at no expense of structure. The first is my personal favorite in the set. Many conductors I think treat this as an early "romantic" Sibelius work (as though it is not "real" Sibelius) and it often comes off rather Tchaikovsky-ish. Not so here as here it definately sounds like Sibelius. I was also very impressed with the 7th, which despite its short length comes off as having great size and breadth, feeling more like a symphony at the length of a tone poem. My only gripe is the recording of the Sibelius violin concerto, which is simply not worthy of the rest of the set. Fortunately there are many good recordings of that concerto available.
The version of Finlandia in this set features chorus with it and it is sublime. A great bonus with the 7 symphonies."
A composer's unique approach to Sibelius
Santa Fe Listener | Santa Fe, NM USA | 11/01/2007
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Although cogently written, the three-star review here is far off the mark. Woolly? Slow? Lacking in vitality? Segerstam rarely, if ever, displays those flaws. Being a composr himself, his highly personal approach is full of intensity and vitality. Ondine's recorded sound is crystal clear, and the Helsinki orchestra plays incisively. I think this Sibelius cycle, which sells cheaply at Amazon Marketplace, is a real sleeper, and anyone who loves these symphonies will be excited by what Segerstam does with them -- his way is unique.
Since I've reviewed quite a few of the performances individually, I won't repeat myself here, except to say that my recent discovery of this conductor has added new enthusiasm to my appreciation of Sibelius. To prefer second-rate accounts by Collins and Maazel makes little sense to me, even if we are talking about personal taste."
A Matter of Taste, but...
C. Scott Harrison | 05/01/2008
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Having just digested seven complete sets of Sibelius' symphonies, I too can pick and choose amongst the splendid offerings and find treasures. To my mind and ear, none of the complete sets are "clunkers". In fact, I find all of them to have great merit. I must admit, I do especially love Barbirolli and Collins.. the brashness of Davis(BSO)and Von K.'s suaveness and beauty, especially the 7th. But the Segerstam set really is all around exemplary. Fine performances, chilly yet with passion. Superb, realistic sound and interpretations that, while some might quibble with, are personal and interesting. Great set. Five stars!"
A Mixed Bag
Matthew DeNero | Colorado, USA | 01/23/2010
(3 out of 5 stars)
"There are some things to admire and some to regret with these recordings. The performances are well recorded with rich, detailed sound, but the readings are too often on the slack side. In addition it seems Segerstam feels the need to go over the top with idiosyncratic phrasing. The 2nd Symphony for instance. Segerstam has this going in fine form with powerful, expansive sound until he gets to the finale. There, In an attempt to create emphasis and passion, he inserts a slight, odd hesitation preceding each proclamation of the main theme. It sounds contrived and adds nothing. That theme can only be described as an anthem and accordingly must be delivered straight-up and unaffected. Then there is the 5th. Here Segerstam gets even further along before derailing. It's a full bodied performance, recorded with transparency, the famous Swan Hymn delivered majestically, but he so exaggerates the accelerando in the closing bars that it detracts from the structure of the entire work. The accelerando is there in the score, and is heard in every performance to different degrees, but not as Segerstam presents it. The first time I listened I was truly taken up in the experience...and then that! "What the...? Aarrgghhh!" It is truly jarring.
The other symphonies are more successful overall. The 3rd has a full bodied, athletic character that is unusual for this work but effective. The 4th is straightforward, appropriately dark and brooding, again with expansive sound. But perhaps a bit tepid. I am not as enthused by the 6th as some seem to be. It's OK, but a bit too broad for my tastes. I prefer a more lithe, crystalline reading. The 1st is quite powerful and atmospheric as is the 7th. Still, the 7th lacks the full measure of anguish and tension required in its final pages, so that the transcendent power of the final chord seems somewhat underwhelming. The Violin Concerto is competent, but hardly memorable. The choral version of Finlandia is only the second I have heard other then Jarvi/Gothenburg on BIS. That recording is murky and suffers from distortion in climaxes so the crystal clear sound and singing of the subject recording is welcome. Overall I would rank Symphonies 3 and 1 as the most successful, followed by 7, 4 and 6. Really, 7, 4 and 6 can be ranked interchangeably. The Violin Concerto is not particularly compelling but there is nothing wrong with it. Symphonies 2 and 5 are disappointing."