Search - Dmitry Shostakovich, Paavo Berglund, Russian National Orchestra :: Shostakovich: Symphony No. 8 [Hybrid SACD]

Shostakovich: Symphony No. 8 [Hybrid SACD]
Dmitry Shostakovich, Paavo Berglund, Russian National Orchestra
Shostakovich: Symphony No. 8 [Hybrid SACD]
Genre: Classical
 

     
?

Larger Image

CD Details

All Artists: Dmitry Shostakovich, Paavo Berglund, Russian National Orchestra
Title: Shostakovich: Symphony No. 8 [Hybrid SACD]
Members Wishing: 0
Total Copies: 0
Label: Pentatone
Original Release Date: 1/1/2006
Re-Release Date: 6/20/2006
Album Type: Hybrid SACD - DSD
Genre: Classical
Styles: Historical Periods, Modern, 20th, & 21st Century, Symphonies
Number of Discs: 1
SwapaCD Credits: 1
UPC: 827949008467
 

CD Reviews

Marvelous sound, but somewhat detached performance
Giacomo C. | 10/12/2006
(3 out of 5 stars)

"This reading of the 8th is certainly nothing to scoff at, and Pentatone's SACD recording is very nicely done indeed. Good clarity and vivid sound, the rear surround speakers adding a much welcome presence and sense of space.



The performance itself, while having a good sense of line is surprisingly detached and cool in its expression. This dark work veritably seethes with passions both brash and overt and more quietly menacing, with a range of dynamic emotion from resigned hush to climaxes that push the boundary of what can be tolerated... at least that is what the symphony can contain.. but little of this is really felt here.. The slower pacing does little to help this lack of incisiveness and emotional virulence.. it is all rather too 'clean'.



To sum... solid playing and direction, but lacking in passion and impact."
One of Shostakovich's Masterpieces in Brilliant Sound
J Scott Morrison | Middlebury VT, USA | 06/26/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)

"The Eighth Symphony doesn't get as many performances as its towering worth might suggest. Partly, I suppose, that is because it is one of Shostakovich's knottiest works. Written in 1943 and described by the composer for the benefit of his Stalinist masters as 'my thoughts and feelings following the joyous reports on the first victories of the Red Army,' it is in fact a doleful and sarcastic hour-and-a-quarter cry of pain. Paavo Berlund, a noted Shostakovian, emphasizes the dolorous aspects of the symphony, taking, for instance, the first movement slowly and trudgingly; it lasts almost half an hour in itself and one is wrung out by its intensity. The second movement, Allegretto, has a kind of whistling in the graveyard tone, with Shostakovich's patented shrieking piccolos keeping up a brave front. In the third movement, Allegro non troppo, this mood is maintained in a kind of moto perpetuo, again with those shrieking woodwinds crying out almost as if to say 'Stop! Stop!' which of course doesn't happen. One hears percussion interjections that could be interpreted as a firing squad. (Is my imagination running away with me here? I don't think so.) The fourth movement, Largo, slower but mercifully shorter than the first, is a powerful passacaglia -- surely Shostakovich put some of his most tragic and painful music in the form of the passacaglia, cf. the First Violin Concerto -- which leads directly into the finale whose tone is mainly one of resignation and a kind of hard-won and occasionally uneasy serenity that quietly dies away at the movement's (and symphony's) end. Is this Shostakovich caving in to the demands of the apparatchiks, or does it represent a true recognition and reluctant acceptance of the horror of the war-time situation? Surely the latter. In later times, Shostakovich referred to his Seventh and Eighth Symphonies as 'my requiem.'



It is not surprising that only a few years after its premiere the symphony was banned by the Stalinist government. It seems they finally caught on that the music in its own way was criticizing the regime.



This is the second SACD recording of the Eighth. The first, part of a complete traversal by Dmitri Kitajenko and the Gürzenich Orchestra of Cologne, I have not heard. But this effort by Berglund and the excellent Russian National Orchestra, recorded in Moscow in June 2005, would be hard to beat as regards both recorded sound and the performance itself. It is true that other non-SACD recordings have won plaudits -- those by Previn and Ashkenazy come to mind -- but this performance is the most wrenching I've heard. As the excellent booklet note writer Franz Steiger remarks, 'The Symphony No. 8 often exceeds the pain level of the listener.' Be warned, then, that this is not easy music but it is necessary music.



Scott Morrison"
Berglund's broad, painful approach sets his version apart
Santa Fe Listener | Santa Fe, NM USA | 08/25/2009
(5 out of 5 stars)

"Because it coincided with the siege of Leningrad in 1941, the Shostakovich Seventh became his war symphony, and it elevated him to the cover of Time magazine in a civil defense helmet. As propaganda the Seventh scored a major success, but its musical ideas predate Leningrad and seem rather unrelated to that battle, whereas the Eighth, written at lightning speed over two months in 1943 during the assault on Stalingrad, deserves to be called music in the time of war -- a testament of sorrow and grief, or as the composer said, a requiem. The great Evgeny Mravinsky recorded it twice -- the live account from London on BBC Legends is shattering -- but there have been many other successful accounts. This one from 2005 somehow escaped my notice and to be frank, I've found Berglund underpowered in his approach to Shostakovich. Here with the Eighth he is so sorrowful and quiet in the first ten minutes that his reading sets itself apart from the crowd. Clearly Berglund is aiming at a slow build from restrained grief to wailing pain. He definitely gets there, and his Russian players forge ahead over stony ground with great intensity. One can find other acounts that have more tension, virtuosity, and dramatic contrast, but this one is devastating in its anguished sincerity.



The two paired scherzos are the easiest movements to bring off, their shrieking bitterness expressing rage in the starkest terms. In the first Berglund's rhythms are fairly flat-footed, and the overall orchestral work can't compare with the best versions (two from Mravinsky, two from Previn). The second scherzo contrasts the mechanical round-and-round of the string part with eerily shrill interjections from the winds and brass. PentaTone's sonics are full and realistic but perhaps a bit too ambient. For many listeners the last two movements lack the impact of the earlier music, since Shostakovich supplies a gray, sorrowful backdrop that remains muted while many kinds of brief episodes, often recapping previous themes, crop up regularly. But this may well be the heart of the whole symphony, the Passacaglia serving as a kind of spiritual acceptance while never forgetting the violence that preceded it; the same feeling tapers into the finale, with its curdled circus music in the middle before the work's hushed, exhausted close. It's as if we've walked the path of a modern Passion, substituting millions of war victims for Christ.



As you can tell, I find this symphony immensely moving, and I believe Berglund does, too. He is supremely elegiac in the last two movements. Therefore, I am giving this CD an urgent recommendation without forgetting the other superb ones mentioned before."