"This last recording of Zarathustra by Karajan and the Berlin Philharmonic is truly stunning. As pure sound it's heavenly, the recording is rich and the interpretation has a depth and otherworldliness that other versions lack. Some might prefer the leaner, faster Reiner version from 1954 but it's kind of cold and efficient and doesn't embrace the human as much as Karajan does in this performance. Karajan certainly embraces the human and the superhuman in this luscious, grandiose tapestry of sound. If you want to buy several versions, this Karajan version is probably second only to Karajan's 1974 version, which is very famous in it's own right and third place would be Reiner 1954, followed by Reiner 1962, Karajan 1959, Solti in the 1990's with Berlin, Haitink in the 1970's, or whatever other interpretation you prefer. Just make sure you have this Karajan Gold disc in your possession if you care about Also Sprach Zarathustra. I think Karajan's 1974 recording is the finest, but Karajan is basically competing with himself in this music. Only Reiner is in the same elite class, yet his interpretation is markedly different.
The Don Juan is also terrific here and together makes this a must purchase for the fan of Strauss, Karajan or classical music in general. I agree with other people that Karajan's recordings in the 1980's were not always the finest when compared to his previous versions of the same music, however this performance can be placed among his best from the 1980's. Make sure you are purchasing this recording in it's remastered form, the label is Karajan Gold, catalog number 439 016-2."
Good Interpretation, Technical Limitations
G.D. | 05/20/1999
(3 out of 5 stars)
"HvK is one the most renowned conductors of Richard Strauss, and also this CD is certainly no exception. HvK is very demanding, he lives the story like it was his own: The music of the BPO is grandiose, where the score of the poetic drama demands it, and it is sensitive and full of feelings, where most likely Strauss himself would have wanted it. This CD however, has to stand up against the highest of standards actually set by no other than the Maestro himself, back 1973 on DG as well. And here, we have the clash of titan against himself, in two different ages, and of course, with two entirely different recording techniques. With this CD, recorded in the early days of the digital age, the dynamic is much more impressive, there are no contortions whatsoever, but typically for digital recordings of the early '80s, the cords are sterile and the sound is lacking much of often desired characteristic warmth, especially with a to-the-point-precise, strictly objective perfectionist conductor like HvK. The old analog recording offers far more loveliness, like an old blue jeans, that you loved a lot and therefore wore so long. However, even a not so perfect digital DG-Karajan recording is still a good one, and like any new pants, it may become comfortable with age, and so it shall be left to each music friend for himself, which of one the ages, which one of the CDs, or shall we say, blue jeans, to prefer. (RURW)."
Ignore the pan--this is great Strauss
Santa Fe Listener | Santa Fe, NM USA | 09/05/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Comparing them side by side, I also prefer the earlier analog versions of these pieces under Karajan, but he didn't exactly slack off in the digital era. This is superlative, blockbuster Strauss of the kind Karajan did without rival. Thanks to the fame that the opening section gained from Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyseey, the catalog proliferates with versions of Zarathustra, and there's room for more than one viewpoint. As a sonic blockbuster I appreciate Blomstedt's from San Francisco on Decca, for crisp orchestral virtuosity the classic 1954 Reiner from Chicago on RCA, and for musical warmth the lesser known Tennstedt on EMI.
Still, if I had to make a desert island pick, it would be another Karajan version, from 1959, with the Vienna Phil. on Decca. This is the one used for the 2001 soundtrack, and if you can find it in rematered form, the sound is very satisfying despite some analog tape hiss. Karajan's interpretation isn't much changed, but the delicious vienna Phil. makes alll the difference in Strauss."
Karajan's Best Zara?
Scriabinmahler | UK | 03/24/2007
(5 out of 5 stars)
"
Karajan was almost obsessed with R.Strauss Symphonic Poems trying ever to achieve higher level of perfection both artistically and technically (including recording technology). He recorded Don Quixote 4 times, Til Eulenspiegel 6 times, Tod und Verklarung 3 times, Metamorphosen 3 times and so on, excluding many unofficail live recordings.
Also sprach Zarathustra was recorded three times officially; Decca, DG 1973 and this digital version which is grandest and best recorded of all. As to which one is best, opinions are divided depending on personal tastes for interpretation and sound quality. I have an impression that Karajan was more interested in representing the richness and intricacy of Strauss' orchestration with the last digital version, while other two readings are more or less straightforward. Only weakness of the digital version is the opening which is not as spectacular as the other two.
"
Glorious
G.D. | Norway | 12/05/2008
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Sometimes classics like this gets something of a short shrift from reviewers in favor of "new and exciting" releasing. The feeling of `yes, yes, this is Karajan and the Berlin Philharmonic, I know, but listen to this new and controversial recording with x and the (rather scrappy playing of) y ...' Take one step back. Listen, for example, to `Von den Hinterweltlern' on this recording. Honestly, no one else even comes close. This is simply in a class of its own.
The sound bears the hallmarks of those early 80s Deutsche Gramophon recordings; maybe a little too digital for some, but really quite vivid and detailed. The playing is, as already mentioned, marvelous, and no one can seriously doubt that Karajan has the measure of Strauss. That said, I am not sure this version of Also Sprach Zarathustra is really an improvement over his older recording from 1974, maybe the opposite (both with respect to performance and recordings; the analogue sound is warmer and more natural (but the digital does reveal the details better). The Don Juan is equally excellent.
Of course, that 1974 performance is now available from DG as well, with both Don Juan and Till Eulenspiegel - which might in the end be an even more tempting proposition. Still, it would be ridiculous to award this one anything less than a top rating."