Search - Bohuslav Martinu, Neemi Jarvi, Bamberger Symphoniker :: Martinu: Complete Symphonies

Excellent (best?) set of Martinu symphonies

Long-time listener | Wichita KS, USA | 04/29/2009

(5 out of 5 stars)

"It seems to me that this may be the most recommendable set of Martinu's symphonies available now. Neumann's set is excellent as well, but while it has gained many adherents over time, I feel that with the advantage of better recording Jarvi's is a more worthwhile purchase for anyone new to this music who is looking for the complete set. Jarvi is sometimes known for brisk or driving tempos, but here his tempos are more relaxed and spacious than those of Bryden Thompson, for example, and as a result these performances have a melodicism and a luminous atmosphere superior to that set. The orchestral playing and recording quality are all they need to be. Some individual recordings may strike listeners as superior in some respect (I like Claus Peter Flor's recording of No. 1 as much or better), but as a set this is hard to top."

Martinu's Symphonic Cycle from Jarvi -- superb!

R. Hutchinson | a world ruled by fossil fuels and fossil minds | 03/09/2010

(5 out of 5 stars)

"I discovered this Brilliant box of Martinu in Berlin on the way from the Friedrichstrasse Bahnhof to the Brecht-Weigel House on Chausseestrasse. An excellent bargain!



Bohuslav Martinu (1890-1959) only began composing symphonies after fleeing the Nazis into American exile in 1941. He was of a generation that saw the symphony as passe -- Bartok was born in 1881 and Stravinsky in 1882, and Martinu was born in 1890 -- while Mahler was born in 1860, and Sibelius and Nielsen in 1865. Modernism entailed new forms and styles, and while Martinu was never a modernist he did inhabit a soundworld with a lighter touch full of dance rhythms, not heavy, four-square symphonies. But he received a commission from Koussevitsky and the Boston Symphony, so he wrote a symphony. And then another, and another... He ended up composing a symphony a year every year from 1942 to 1946, No.s 1 through 5, and later a Sixth, his most popular. They are graceful, full of dancing rhythms, and of classical proportions, ranging from 23 to 36 minutes in length. Symphonies 1, 2 and 4 are in the traditional four-movement form, while No.s 3, 5 and 6 each have three movements. The First, Third and Sixth were premiered by the Boston Symphony, the Second was premiered by the Cleveland Orchestra, the Fourth was premiered by the Philadelphia Orchestra, and the Fifth is unique in having been premiered by the Czech Philharmonic and Rafael Kubelik.



Symphony No. 1 demonstrated that Martinu's gifts, previously applied to the concerto grosso form, all manner of chamber music, and opera, could be applied to great effect to the symphonic form, despite his misgivings. Its success spurred him on. Symphony No. 2 is shorter and uses Czech and Moravian folk melodies in the slow movement, his most Czech symphony, and features the use of several small groups of instruments. Symphony No. 3 stands out from the others in its dark and somber hue. While parts of the First and Second had reflected the war, the Third is clearly marked by it through and through. It is Martinu's only work that reminds me of Shostakovich in its gravity and tragic cast. It is a powerful work which ends without a triumphant resolution, despite Beethoven's Eroica being an inspiration and despite the D-Day landing at Normandy taking place shortly before Martinu completed it. Though atypical, I consider this to be one of the finest jewels in this string of six. The Fourth complements the Third perfectly as it celebrates victory. The second movement Allegro vivo reminds me of nothing so much as the scherzo to Beethoven's 9th, a propulsive dancing march rhythm. It has the forward momentum of the opening of Roussel's Third Symphony, but is lighter on its feet. And the Poco allegro finale is an ecstatic celebration, the triumph that was withheld at the conclusion of the Third. The Fifth is more questing and tentative after that burst of enthusiasm. It was first heard at the inaugural Prague Spring Festival in 1947. A head injury caused by a fall from an open second-floor terrace led to several years of expensive treatment and convalesence, but Martinu returned to composing at the peak of his powers. The Sixth was finished in 1953, and is the most broadly Romantic of his symphonies, sounding like Copland in parts with lush, sweeping melodies, and using the melody "Across the Wide Missouri," though I've never seen this mentioned anywhere. Listen for yourself and see. It remains one of Martinu's most popular works.



This box, with Neemi Jarvi leading the Bamberg Symphony Orchestra, is now in direct competition with the Chandos box of Martinu symphonies with Bryden Thomson leading the Royal Scottish National Orchestra. (And it replaces the earlier BIS box .) They were recorded at about the same time -- Jarvi's cycle, originally on BIS, in 1987/1988, and Thomson's in 1989/1990. This set combines the works chronologically, with 1 & 2 on Disc One, 3 & 4 on Disc Two, and 5 & 6 on Disc Three. The Chandos box pairs 1 & 5, 2 & 6 and 3 & 4. I prefer the chronological ordering myself. The Chandos box is a "true box" with the discs in cardboard sleeves, while this Brilliant set is not actually a box, but rather a fold-out with three jewel-case inserts for the discs. Not as elegant, but it works.



Some have reached the sweeping conclusion that the Thomson set is faster than the Jarvi set. This is not totally accurate. Comparing movement by movement, Jarvi is actually faster in 8, while Thomson is faster in 13. It is true that Jarvi takes the slow movements more slowly, but the overall timing does not dramatically differ between the two. And while both cycles are fine accomplishments, I would not be without Jarvi's Third, which I prefer decisively over Thomson's because the opening is *faster.* Overall Thomson excels in bringing out the dancing rhythms in Martinu, while Jarvi is better at accentuating the more classical, more Germanic, elements, but these differences are relatively minor.



If you are a symphony lover, and/or someone interested in hearing great early 20th century classical music, you should definitely not miss the symphonies of Martinu!





"