J Scott Morrison | Middlebury VT, USA | 04/19/2003
(2 out of 5 stars)
"It pains me to write the following. I had waited in eager anticipation for this release. I have loved the recording of the Études that Pierre-Laurent Aimard made for the Ligeti Edition but wanted to hear another pianist's take on these towering masterpieces of late 20th-century piano music. I thought 'who better than Idil Biret?' After all, she is a real virtuoso and in her playing of Romantic masters, like Chopin, she has shown that she can make poetry of music. Alas, this was not to be. In what I can only read as a self-serving note in the enclosed booklet, Biret indicates that she slows down some of the études, explaining that composers often don't really know whether their music can be played as written. And so she decided she would follow the 'musical markings' rather than the specified timings supplied by Ligeti. It certainly appears to me that Aimard manages the markings quite nicely and at the required tempi. Further, he does so with a far more poetic management of dynamics, tempi and phrasing. Indeed, HE is the one who plays this modern masterpiece as if it were Chopin. The sound of her piano doesn't help Biret; it is somewhat harsh. But, more than that, much of her playing sounds like she is just managing the notes, not the music within them. I can only assume that her interpretations were not settled enough to record them. Although it is hard to conceive of such difficult pieces being sight-read straight through, her playing is rough and ready enough to suggest little more than that. I am convinced that with more study she could have done a much more nuanced job of it. She's a fine musician and a wonderful pianist. Maybe she'll have another chance to record them in the future. Meanwhile, these simply won't do. I would strongly urge a buyer to look for the Aimard version (also available here at amazon.com); it contains more music (the 'Musica ricercata' and part of Book III) and only costs a little more. (I have not had the opportunity to hear the recordings of two other pianists, Lucille Chung [doing Book II] or Fredrik Ullén [I & II].)Scott Morrison"
Not competitive
scarecrow | 01/04/2004
(2 out of 5 stars)
"I listened to this recording of the Ligeti Etudes many times, and enjoyed it a lot, but the more I became accustomed to the unique sound, the more I felt that something was missing. For example, the first etude, which others have highly praised, was disappointing. The 13th seemed to lose intensity in the middle, almost as though the pianist started with an unsustainable tempo. So eventually I found and bought the Aimard recording (only a few dollars more) and it was a revelation--vastly more artistic and virtuosic than this one. Actually I enjoy this CD more now, as an example of how the same piece can be played so differently by different pianists. But for a first CD of this great music, the Biret is not the CD to get."
An awful performance of a sublime set of piano pieces
Christopher Culver | 09/28/2004
(1 out of 5 stars)
"Gyorgy Ligeti's "Piano Etudes", with two books completed and one in progress, are some of contemporary music's most outstanding works for piano. Ligeti began the work in the early 1980's as part of a wholesale evaluation of his compositional technique. Gone is the micropolyphony of his earlier pieces, but in its place Ligeti displays a number of ingenious new musical avenues, with two major inspirations. The first is chaos theory and fractal mathematics, and the second is African polyphony. What makes the Etudes particularly fascinating is that some of them are meant to be too fast for any human pianist, and their definitive versions are for player piano. For some of these player piano renditions one should seek out "Gyorgy Ligeti Edition 5: Mechanical Music". Ligeti's favourite merely human pianist is Pierre-Laurent Aimard, who gives a must-have performance of the first two books on "Gyorgy Ligeti Edition 3: Works for Piano".
Unfortunately, on this disc Idil Biret gives a very poor performance. She decides to ignore the given tempo and play slowly by only by the musical markings. This is a silly decision, showing that she prepared this recording with little study of the material or forethought. Biret just ignores what Ligeti intended and plays painfully slowly. She also plays rather heavily, and doesn't have the nimbleness of other pianists who have tackled the work.
This collection is unusual among human performances in that it contains Etude 14a, "Coloana fara sfarsit" which Ligeti premiered as a player piano performance on "Gyorgy Ligeti Edition 5: Mechanical Music". It is, in fact, the original fourteenth etude, but when even Aimard begged Ligeti for something a human could approach, Ligeti substituted "Coloana Infinita" instead. Biret should have known that this piece is simply too fast for a mere mortal, and her performance of it is incredibly ugly.
The liner notes give a brief description of each piece of the Etudes, and Biret's own apology for her method of approaching it all. However, everything is rather spare, as is usual with a Naxos disc, and Romanian words are annoyingly typeset incorrectly.
I would recommend getting the performance by Pierre-Laurent Aimard, Ligeti's favourite pianist, on "Gyorgy Ligeti Edition 3: Works for Piano". That recording has the benefit of being supervised by Ligeti himself and so can be slightly definitive. While Biret's renditions here have the affordability of a Naxos disc, she gives a flawed performance that should be avoided."
Biret makes music like anyone else.
scarecrow | Chicago, Illinois United States | 06/12/2007
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Wow!!, with major hitters as Ullen, Banfield, and Aimard have mesmorized everyone, the afficianados of the post-modern, and poor Idil is in bad company here with all the self-righteous knowers of the knowledgable materials of the modern piano; of correct tempi, of pace,density, fortitude,romantic abandonment and gesture even.
The fact is that any great piece of music or sets of them as the ubiquitous "etudes" have that inner necessity to be interpreted,not simply mindlessly played.You cannot argue with Ullen's or Aimard's playing, it is brilliant in all respects. But then why should anyone then play them, is there room for other readings? There should be. TThe genre "Etude" has had a rich life in post-modernity, I know of at least 50, Fifty composers who have modern etudes, modeled (unofficially) after GYorgy there must be hundreds of etudes written since Cage "Etudes Australes" kicked off the modern genre arguably). Ligeti is indebted to Nancarrow,(YouTube has a wonderful documentary on Ligeti) who began his studies and "treatise" of rhythm/texture but little else in the Forties, musical automata, and the player piano.Nancarrow was ignored most of his life until Ligeti, who has always himself found fascination with musical automata, the 100 metronomes cute experiment attests to the initial stages of this creative trajectory. So indebtedness goes all the way around, and no one can claim some influence someplace. These"etudes"all three Books are master-works only because Ligeti finds his own voice within the genre, and does so wonderfully as well as creating an exciting set, worth learning by any pianist interested in the modern legacy, whatever that remains.These "etudes" also point to the ideology of modernity its content has been lowerd, democraticized toward relatively easier listening experiences, although there are many who cannot listen at all to this nicely rounded sets.
But these etudes are not simply fodder to play the hell out of to run through the mill as Ullen. The technique in Ullen is blazing,he brings out the "industrial"dimensions of modern timbre and Aimard as well, bangs the Hell out of them. Biret on the other hand brings a lyricism, and reflection not shown at times by the other two piano masters, Biret is slower but you remind me of Gunter Schuller who claimed he was the only one(The only one) who knew correct tempi and how musical literature is suppose to go, and went and wasted his time (what else does he have to do, he is an uninspired composer, dull, bored with himself)giving entire laundry lists of tempi.
Biret is a great sensitive musician and finds her voice here.The fact that she plays Ligeti slower is unimportant and insignificant. These "etudes" brings out the worse in a player however should technique be the focus and the trajectory for expression. I think these works hover in between. It is music,and it should suggest something beyond sheer pummeling the piano,these etudes do skate around this, is it musical automata?, No music,Ligeti's late music here wanted to suggest the image, and does so, so poetically in the later ones as the one to " to Irina" "White on White",(Book 3) and the infinite column,(Ullen is incredible almost like a blur, one colour, like a minimalism of timbre, the last one in Book 2; and not the focus to form arguments, and their more sportslike quality, who plays them the fastest without making a mistake, Wow!!,Adorno in the Fifties said that the avant-garde would be become more "sports-like, with "marathons"(pianist play all the sets, all the "etudes", (Arditti play all the Bartok and Carter on successive nights) I'm impressed to a degree.So who plays the fastest? is not the point.
Buy the Biret simply because she brings something that the others do not., it is good playing Unless you are sports people."
Idil Amazing
Laurie Dechiaro | 10/20/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"I adore everything about the pianist, her shear ability to understand every piece, her understanding of the period, composer's ideas, the types of pianos, everything. Shes marvelously intelligent, yet so many people badger her about it.
she makes outstanding judgments about these music in that what the composer hears in their head, is technically what is able to be played or tested on a piano. She truly dissects a piece miraculously and is the only pianist that does this deed
Her playing is recognizable, very clean, phenomenal technique, the whole bit; that is what you get when you purchase an idil biret album. Her playing is keeping in the times of what the composer wants--everyone assumes that if it is marked fff then you must attack the piano with all might; she conveys the music in such a way that ff is achieve, without have that pirticular aggressive that plagues so many artists.
Being an enermous fan of birets, this is an amazing album, and if you wish to a unique and one in a million interpretation, choose this one. Dont believe the asinine remarks by utterly ignorant musicians."