Ralph J. Steinberg | New York, NY United States | 08/24/2003
(5 out of 5 stars)
"As far as I am concerned, there are three supreme recordings of the Fifth Symphony: Furtwaengler's 1937 BPO reading, Kleiber's Concertgebouw performance, and Weingartner's 1932 British Symphony rendition, the one under current consideration. This performance is a superb synthesis of electricity and gravity, the First Movement being much darker and ominous than usual. The Finale is one of the few that maintains the tension generated by the earlier movements, something that only Furtwaengler also was able to achieve. The "Pastorale" is only slightly less impressive, mainly because the Royal Philharmonic at that time was not a permanent organization and therefore less responsive than other orchestras to Weingartner's demands. The Eleven Viennese Dances are lovingly and lightly played, and make a perfect companion to the two Symphonies. I'm looking forward to further installments in this Weingartner series on Naxos. Dare I hope for the rest of his Beethoven, the Brahms, Mozart, Wagner, etc?"
One hit, one near-miss, and one charmer
J Scott Morrison | Middlebury VT, USA | 04/07/2003
(4 out of 5 stars)
"Naxos continues to release discs in its series of Beethoven recordings by Felix Weingartner (1863-1942) who was the first conductor to record all the Beethoven symphonies. I exulted about the release of the Third and Fourth Symphonies earlier this year. I'm afraid I'm not as enthusiastic about this release, because the recording of the Sixth ('Pastoral') is not up to the others I've heard.Weingartner, for some reason, recorded the Pastoral Symphony only once (as opposed to four times, say, for the Fifth). And this recording was fairly early in the 'electric era,' 1927, and the current record's producer, the redoubtable Mark Obert-Thorn, indicates that it suffered from 'severe pitch instability on every [78 rpm] side.' Efforts were made, of course, to compensate for this, but I'm afraid it still is somewhat in evidence. More important, however, is the lackluster playing of the Royal Philharmonic. This is not to say that Weingartner doesn't do his usual masterful shaping and moulding of the music. But his players seem to be having, shall we say, an off day. In addition, for my taste the 'Scene by the brook' seems hurried. The 'Thunderstorm,' is successfully conveyed but hindered by clipped fortissimi.The Fifth, on the other hand, is a veritable blockbuster. This is the third of four complete recordings of the symphony made by Weingartner and dates from 1932. Strangely, it was never released in the UK, although it was in the US until replaced by Weingartner's fourth recording of the work. The orchestra for this recording was the British Symphony Orchestra which was founded in order to give returned World War I veterans an orchestra to play in. Do not think for a second that this was some ad hoc group that was a sort of make-work scheme for some sad returning musicians. It was a crack group that lasted for a number of years and made a number of fine recordings. And this is one of them. The Fifth crackles with excitement and brio as well as precision and musicianly phrasing. Weingartner was perhaps known best for his ability to bring out elegantly nuanced dynamics in the service of a work's architecture. As mentioned in my previous review of the 'Eroica,' one delight is his ability to command sforzandi that are gauged to the surrounding dynamic rather than simply hitting you in the face. The disc concludes with Eleven Viennese Dances, WoO. 17, charming trifles that are charmlingly played.Of course, one must make allowances for recordings made so early in the electric era, but Obert-Thorn has done his usual fine job of giving us the best sound possible and he can't be blamed for the pitch and distortion problems in the 'Pastoral.'"
Blessed is Beethoven - Blessed is Weingartner!
Pupil | Malkuth | 11/19/2003
(5 out of 5 stars)
"This is by far the most organic and selfless recording of the fifth symphony I have ever heard.
It dances where others trudge, it soars effortlessly where others try very hard to. Its spiritual qualities are never demeaned by the mind's silly efforts to conceptualize the divine. It is perfectly present, perfectly natural.
This music might make you cry, because I definitely think it is the closest to Beethoven's conception, and Beethoven is the greatest composer who ever lived and blessed mankind with his works."
Fine Fifth, Lesser Sixth
Jeffrey Lipscomb | Sacramento, CA United States | 07/07/2004
(4 out of 5 stars)
"This remarkable Beethoven 5th from 1932 is the 3rd of four recordings of the work by Weingartner and, to my ears, it's the best of the bunch. My introduction to the British Symphony Orchestra heard here was a recording from the same year of the Violin Concerto, which featured a sublime reading of the solo part by Joseph Szigeti and rather lame conducting by Bruno Walter. I will always wonder now what the tuttis might have sounded like if Weingartner had furnished the accompaniment instead - the ensemble playing in this 5th is really quite extraordinary!
I am also bowled over by what full sound is heard in this transfer - very few 1932 recordings come any way near the sonic realism of this transfer. As for the performance, all the usual Weingartner strengths are on display: firmly taut rhythm, perfect orchestral balances, and a clear sense of direction. Of the other celebrated "straight & classical" 5ths on my shelves, the Erich Kleiber/Amsterdam now strikes me as a bit hard-boiled and perfunctory by comparison (but glorious playing!) Likewise the Carlos Kleiber (son of Erich) with the VPO on DG seems a trifle relentless (the latter conductor's "live" reading with the Chicago Symphony is, to my ears, a more sympathetic rendering). I would place this Weingartner 5th along side the great 1949 Schuricht/ Paris Conservatory account (once on Decca LP and badly in need of a good, unfiltered transfer to CD) as the great "classical" pair of 5ths.
Unfortunately, Weingartner's "Pastoral" is not on the same level: it's simply too hasty and sounds rather strait-laced and unbending. But I was genuinely surprised at how good the sound is for a 1927 recording, despite a few pitch problems. Apparently Weingartner hoped to re-record the 6th but somehow never got around to it before his death in 1942. What a shame! Also on the drawing board was the Schubert 9th - one of the conductor's favorite works - but sadly we will never know it under his baton.
The early Eleven Viennese Dances are real charmers. Not only is this their finest recording, but I am reminded once again of what a genial purveyor of minor fare Weingartner could be - he was also a wonderful conductor of Strauss Waltzes. The transfer of the Dances is much fuller and clearer than what was heard on an earlier Pearl CD (coupled with the 9th Symphony).
Recommended for the 5th and the Viennese Dances. And despite too-brisk tempos and variable sound, the 6th is not without its charms - but for a "straight" Pastoral you're better off with Erich Kleiber (Decca) or Carl Schuricht (EMI complete set)."
Going for the 5th
Franco Landi | Irvine, California | 05/10/2004
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Bought this to have another rendition of the 5th. What a lucky find. This is the only rendition among four I own that I can play without feeling exhausted by the end of the symphony. It's old school (Conductor Weingartner was born in 1863 when Abraham Lincoln was still president). The performance is well-balanced, with beautifully defined musical lines. It is never over-blown, nor drenched with reverb. It is the only rendition I could re-play in one sitting. That says a lot. The Eleven Viennese Dances are as charming as one reviewer has already mentioned. I admit, I have yet to listen to the 6th. I understand it's lacking. That's o.k., for Karl Böhm already has it well-covered. So, 5 stars for the 5th and the Dances. If you are into collecting Beethoven's 5th, you want this one."