Thomas F. Bertonneau | Oswego, NY United States | 08/05/2001
(5 out of 5 stars)
"George Enescu's (1880-1955) Third Symphony in C-Major (1919-1921) surpasses even his Second in A Major (1916-1917) in the sumptuousness of its instrumentation and the largeness of its scale. The Second deploys a huge orchestra, which the Third not only duplicates but then bolsters by the addition of a wordless four-part chorus and an organ. Like the vast, late tone-poems of Richard Strauss or the feverish orchestral compositions of Alexander Scriabin, the symphonies of George Enescu seem ripe with narrative and philosophical import. Their proximity to World War One, in which Romania fought with the Allies, underlines the impression. If the Second be agitated and desperate throughout, managing only a mock victory in the martial apotheosis of the Finale, the Third traces a development from agitation and despair to something like conciliation or hope. The long First Movement (Moderato, Un Poco Maestoso [20.27]) begins quietly over a slow duple rhythm in the timpani; the mood remains dark, even as a trumpet signal attempts to light the scene from out of the depth. A theme in three-quarter time briefly clarifies the atmosphere, which returns, however, to brooding cloudiness. The trumpet-signal later becomes a richly harmonized fanfare, strongly reminiscent of those in Ernest Bloch's "Schelomo." The climax happens about thirteen minutes into the movement, where Enescu asserts the major key, only to let it subside in renewed minor-key disgruntlement. The opening material, with its timpani rhythms, returns with perfunctory ferociousness at the end. Rozhdestvensky paces this Moderato with fine calculation and, helped expertly by the Chandos engineers, brings out the subtleties of Enescu's orchestral counterpoint. The Second Movement (Vivace, Ma Non Troppo [15.21]) combines dance-like gestures with grotesque elements, somewhat in the manner of a Mahler scherzo. The gloomy and threatening march from the beginning of the Moderato resurfaces in a most glowering guise. The Third Movement (Lento, Ma Non Troppo), lasting nearly as long as the First, achieves its hard-earned relaxation with the help of the chorus and the organ. Enescu borrowed Cesar Franck's "cyclical" model for his First Symphony and used it again in both the Second and the Third. The Third's Lento thus retrieves material from the Moderato and the Vivace in altered form. The end comes quietly. The coupling is Enescu's Romanian Rhapsody No. 1 (1902), suitably energetic under Rozhdestvensky's direction. Musicologist Gabriela Ocneanu links Enescu to "impressionism" broadly construed as movement embracing not only Debussy's idiosyncratic harmony but Gregorian archaism as in Respighi and Eastern European folk-music exoticism as in Bartok and Janacek. She writes of Enescu that he "assimilated these currents so as to be able afterwards... to give [them] their full strength. In this way Enescu helped to reveal certain... essential characteristics of... human spirituality, which thus could appear and grow at [a] favorable moment." Rozhdestvensky's performances underline Ocneanu's argument. A magnificent disc, with an attractive booklet (photographs of Romanian folk-life on the cover) and decent, if not excellent, notes. Recommended."
Enescu's Symphony No. 3 is a 20th cen. musical masterpiece
gaspar | 03/18/1999
(5 out of 5 stars)
"The highlight of this well-recorded and inspiredly conducted program is Enescu's Symphony No. 3, a musical masterpiece by all accounts. Not to be missed is its third movement's wordless chorus-- a divine inspiration. Also recommended are Enescu's 2nd Symphony and, especially, his masterpiece, the opera "Oedipe"."
One of the best symphonies in the History of Music
"When I listened Enescu's music for the first time I couldn't understand how a composer like this has remained relatively unknown in comparisson with other contemporaries.
His Symphony nº3 is one of the undoubted masterpieces of Symphonic Music. It depicts pictorially the three "Worlds" -Earth, Hell and Heaven (in this order)- in a "Respighian" way, with a superb orchestral colour and solemnity, magnified by the use of piano, organ and a worldless chorus in the third movement.
The climax of the second movement is absolutely impactant, with the brass reaching uncommon Heights of power and violence as the prince of darkness enters the scene. In contrast, the peaceful and idylic third movement seems to lift the listener, by the end of the symphony, "à la Scriabin", as if he were on a cloud way to Heaven.
An absolute masterpiece. PURE MUSICAL GOLD in this superb recording."
His greatest hit, plus the piece that OUGHT to be
R. Gregory Capaldini | Arlington, VA United States | 05/03/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Romanian Rhapsody #1 has been recorded many times, and it's as much fun as you can have with an 80-piece orchestra. Probably Enescu's greatest hit, it's self-recommending and nicely done here. But oh my... where DID this haunting Symphony #3 come from? I literally had never heard it in 40 years of listening. This 1918 score defies categorization, having good points of varied composers in one gorgeous melange: the nobility of Bruckner with the perfume of Debussy in the first movement; sinister Martinu-like burblings with the orchestral muscle of Strauss in the second; and a sedate, divine final movement with added pipe organ and wordless choir like Holst's "Planets." The sound engineering is particularly impressive in this movement. Some reviewers feel the conducting by Rozhdestvensky is a bit limp, but my copy of this recording hasn't come out of the CD player for three days now. Enjoy this!"
Romanian Rhapsody I
M | 09/29/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Such a supremely gifted musician as Enescu naturally absorbed folk-music of his rural Romania. His conservatoire years instilled in him largely Germanic traditions, yet his debts to Wagner and Brahms were balanced by similar debts to French masters. But at heart Enescu was Romanian; an important consequence of his series of works using Romanian folk-song. It is fascinating to compare his early folk-based music with that of Bartok - his contemporary - for both began in this field from somewhat Lisztian principles, as in the earlier master's "Hungarian" works. If Bartok found his roots - coincidentally researching Romanian folk-music - with ethnomusicological purity, at the zenith of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Enescu created, alone, an international Romanian "school". From Enescu's official Op.1 - the Romanian Poem of 1897 - to his penultimate score, the Romanian Overture of 1948, we find several nationalist works using aspects of Romanian folk-music: part-modal and part-pentatonic, with richly-ornamented tunes of Eastern provenance. The most famous and brilliantly successful of these works were the two Romanian Rhapsodies, Op.11. The first, in A major, was written in 1901; the second, in D major, in 1902. They were premiered at same concert in February 1903 conducted by the composer, with No.2 played before No.1, as become his custom. The first Romanian Rhapsody begins with an improvisatory section in which the main theme is announced by solo wind before being taken up by the orchestra, recreating the sound of cobza - a plucked folk instrument. Enescu then sets out before us a succession of festive scenes from rural life, superbly orchestrated, culminated in the 'ciocarlia': a famous device in popular Romanian string-player in which the sound of bird is imitated. If the First Rhapsody is based on dance music, the seconds founded on songs, with the folk element more fully developed than in the former. At first we hear an extended and noble theme, Phrygian in modal inflection, on full orchestra; Eastern characteristics follow to embroider with much richness the orchestral tapestry. A dance episode is given to a string quartet, as if a group of gypsy players suddenly emerge from the orchestra to the front of stage, execute their piece an return to their places before a gentle clarinet solo ends the Rhapsody."