Interesting Symphony, Insipid Concerto
David DeLucia | East Haddam, Ct. United States | 07/01/2006
(2 out of 5 stars)
"I had originally thought that Gillis' Encore Concerto was the worst piano concerto ever written, but this woof-woof makes the earlier work sound like a masterpiece. At least the movements of the first concerto were mercifully short. Here, you have up to 15 minutes of the most hackneyed, trite material imaginable, dished up with lackluster orchestration that is repetitious in the extreme. The first movement of this disasterous effort almost starts to sound like watered down Rachmaninoff, then quickly disintegrates into a weak musical figure which is repeated on and off for 4 excruciatingly long minutes. I lost interest after that...I guess the last 5 minutes or so were an attempt to reprise the beginning, with minimal impact. The second movement waltz sounds like a mixture of honkey tonk piano, "circus music" and something an organ would play at the 7th inning stretch at Fenway Park. It's so bad it's good, making Grofe and Anderson sound profound by comparison. Nothing ever happens in this music, just the ultra sweet waltz theme played over and over again lest we forget how wonderful (!) it is. In the last movement, which is episodic to the extreme, there is actually a part which sounds like Habernera from Carmen. (hint: Carmen is better) I actually burst out laughing in the last minute or so, which is basically a five chord going to a one chord....SEVERAL times. Why any orchestra or soloist would waste their time on this honeyed cow slop is a real mystery. Even the God-awful Grofe piano concerto has this turkey beat by a mile!
The fourth Symphony is better (It's hard to imagine anything worse than the 2nd Piano concerto.) I particularly like the slow movement, which is elegaic in tone and actually moving here and there. In the other movements, Gillis resorts to the same tired patterns he uses in his other symphonies- bombastic brass fanfares, "pseudo -Hoe Down" riffs, endless boring sequences. The end result is interesting now and then but really doesn't add up to more than the sum of its parts.
How sad that the performances and recording are nothing short of phenonenal. They deserve 5 stars, but the icky sticky cutesy tootsy music barely rates 1 star!"
Well Worth Owning
David L Hutchins | Mesa, AZ | 03/31/2007
(4 out of 5 stars)
"Some people don't think Don Gillis compares to our best American Composers such as Copland, Thomson or Grofe. I disagree. All of the Gillis works are at least as interesting as those by other American Composers. Gillis wrote light, fun music and this album is no exception. The only other reviewer when I wrote this, didn't like the concerto, especially the last movement. I enjoyed it almost more than the symphony and liked the last movement the best. To each his own, I suppose. Maybe Gillis was an imitator and that's what bothers some people. It seems to me that imitation can be very skillful as one can imitate without sounding too much like another composer. Gillis had his own unique sound and while these works aren't his best, there are certainly still very good. With almost no Gillis recordings available a couple of years ago, it's wonderful to have these now. Gillis may not have been the most original composer or even considered a top-notch composer, but his works are so enjoyable and listenable, who cares?"