Thomas F. Bertonneau | Oswego, NY United States | 10/07/2000
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Anton Bruckner's most popular symphonies are no doubt numbers Four and Seven; most aficionados of the nineteenth century symphonic repertoire also are familiar with and feel fondness for numbers Six, Eight, and Nine. The Fifth is more daunting, but it is frequently recorded and has become something a test for daring interpreters. The remaining six symphonies - the oddly designated Symphonies Nos. "00" and "0," along with Nos. 1 through 3 - remain much less visited by conductors and constitute terra incognita for most listeners. Commentators sometimes remark that these scores do not reveal the mature Bruckner, who appears only with the Fourth. This is a pity, since even the "Doppelnullte" ("00") has much to offer. Georg Tintner, who died last year after completing the first fully integral recorded edition of Bruckner's cycle (for Naxos), understood this. Tintner's "take" of the Third Symphony makes a powerful case for regarding this work as, indeed, Bruckner in the major phase of his creativity. Tintner also respects the composer's initial version of the score, from which he later (on well meant but misguided advice from friends) excised hundred of bars. In restituting the excisions, Tintner restores the many Wagner quotations that not only ornament Bruckner's symphonic argument, but generate motifs and themes as well. Sir Roger Norrington also recorded the original version of the Third. His First Movement requires 18 minutes; Tintner's needs 30 minutes. For the Finale, Norrington requires 15 minutes, Tintner 20 minutes. The difference stems from Tintner's slow tempi; but this does not mean a limp or annoyingly undramatic persusal of the music. On the contrary, Tintner always manages to keep the tension up. He makes Norrington seem rushed. This CD is a first-rate installment in a first-rate Bruckner cycle."
Pure Brucknerian glory
cmk | Oregon | 06/08/2001
(5 out of 5 stars)
"This is a magnificent and very expansive performance of the original 1873 score of Bruckner's 3rd symphony. When I first got this symphony, I could not figure it out right at first. After about 5 listens, it make sense and I liked it. After a few more, I loved it. After a few more, I was crazy about it. In this piece you hear something new every time you hear it. It greatly improves with repeated listening.(I was also a very young Brucknerian, I was just beginning my collection. That's actually probably the main reason.) If you don't figure it out right at first, don't let that discourage you. You could start out with a shorter performance of one of the cut editions, but I really think other editions pale in comparison to this one, the original. Tintner takes more time on the first movement then anyone else before him, clocking in at a whopping 30:34. No one else even comes close(the closest is something like 25:34). The first movement has so many wonderful passages in it. It is one of my favorite symphonic movements of all time. And Tintner's broad tempo only adds to the grandeur. However, he never drags it, or for that matter, the entire symphony. In fact, he makes others sound rushed and kinda bouncy. Bruckner marked this movement "Gemmasigt, Misterioso" or moderatly, mysterious. The slower tempo in particular makes the slower and quiet sections sound much more mysterious. The Adagio is a very beautiful piece and the RSNO strings sound really good in it. The Scherzo is the shortest and most energetic of the movements. Toward the end of the finale, we all the sudden hear the 2nd theme from the first movement. Then the main theme from the 2nd movement, and then the little turn figure at the beginning of the Scherzo before going of into the finale, triumphant Coda. A truly awesome moment. The Royal Scottish National Orchstra is a very fine ensemble with elegent strings and a glowing brass section. If you get just one performance of the 3rd, get this one. This performance is by far the greatest in Georg Tintner's cycle. .... You can't loose with this one. This is pure Brucknerian glory."
Stunning and awesome
Allan R. MacLeod | 03/05/2000
(5 out of 5 stars)
"This is the first recording released by Naxos since Tintner's untimely death. It is a fitting tribute to his love for Bruckner and his achievement in bringing to us the original versions of the person whom he called "the master"s' works. The original version is seldom performed--and based on Inbal's earlier version, I thought with good reason. But this seems to be one of those cases where Bruckner's first instincts were right. It is always at first slightly distressing to hear passages that shouldn't be there (based on later versions) but after getting over the diorienting effects, the version seems totally convincing. The RSNO is a major orchestra and plays superbly. The sound is stunning. The interpretation is transcendent, sending shivers up and down one's spine. There is love, passion, hope and beauty in this performance. It goes to the top of my list of performances of the Third, even though I am very fond of Haitink's recordings of the second version of this, one of Bruckner's supreme achievements."
Tintner's finest work
Mike Willis | Trafalgar, Victoria Australia | 06/27/2000
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Now that the late Georg Tintner's Bruckner cycle is virtually complete (his Bruckner symphony number one is listed for release and is gradually making its way around the world), it is interesting to consider the complete cycle overall - and in doing just that, one can't help but think that this version of the third symphony (together with the sterling performance of the fourth) ranks amongst the peaks of a searching, individual and deeply considered cycle. This third is probably the longest ever (partly a result of the edition used and partly because of the slower than normal tempos) but it never seems to drag and every movement has its moments of power, and grandeur. But what makes this recording particularly important is the particularly successful first movement, which, because of tempo adjustments and care in regard to phrasing, sounds more convincing, flowing and effective than ever before - when even under greats such as Karajan, Bohm, and Jochum - it tended to sound just a little lumpy. (For example, compare Bohm on Decca/London). Here, at last, Tintner seems to have judged tempo issues to perfection and the movement is thus something of revelation. But so too are the other movements. Never one to take an easy or slick path to conducting success, Tintner explores every angle and facet of this endlessly fascinating symphony and by so doing, elevates it to one of Bruckner's finest - and longest! If you have never quite taken to the third symphony, buy this recording and be prepared to be astonished and perhaps surprised: if you (like me) just love the symphony anyway, buy it and be rewarded by one of the finest performances ever recorded. What a shame that Tintner did not live long enough to record the Naxos planned cycle of Bruckner masses, but, still, at least his name will now for all time be linked with one of his very favourite composers, and compatriot, Bruckner."
A MOST MAGNIFICENT BRUCKNER 3RD!
Brucknerian2006 | florida, USA | 05/08/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"A few days ago I attended a concert by the Florida Orchestra,with Stefan Sanderling conducting,which featured Bruckner's 3rd. Having never heard a Bruckner symphony in live concert I was quite excited before the performance. Slowly I became sorely disappointed. The edition Sanderling conducted was the third version (1888/89), and the version I was very familiar with was the original version (1873)played by Tintner- the one I am now reviewing. I cannot understand how any conductor would engage in such an injustice to themself, the audience, and Bruckner fans as to play the later and very truncated version. Bruckner scholars will readily admit this symphony fails structurally in more ways than one, however as they will state and the listener must realize is that Bruckner was opening new doors in symphonic writing and he himself was unsure of how to go about it. This does not mean he was an unable composer, it simply means he was entering a new world, one which he would soon perfect. As for the later versions I have done some Bruckner research and it is quite evident that Bruckner was influenced heavily by Viennese critics and his contemporaries. After the first performance the symphony was rejected and Bruckner began excising and re-orchestrating the symphony, often with his friends actively involved; friends who had no clue what Bruckner was really up to and merely wanted to help write what they wanted to hear. In his will Bruckner gives his original manuscripts to the Vienna library which contain his true intentions, and of which he frequently and significantly remarked 'for later times'.
Fortunately we have his original score and Tintner states, "To my mind this work as originally conceived suffered by its progressive mutilations more and more, and we should take the time to play and listen to this amazing original." Thank God Tintner did. The maestro does a wonderful job pulling this massive 77 minute work together. The moral of the story is this: if you want to hear the first symphony in which Bruckner is discovering/inventing a new symphonic world get this one. It is a compeling and interesting work."