Very good, with the best 4th movement I've heard yet
Christian Ellithorpe | Streamwood, IL United States | 12/06/2002
(4 out of 5 stars)
"This Solti/Margaret Hillis/CSO version was the best of their versions. As said, I think the 4th movement is about as perfect as I've heard, & I've been listening & buying ninths for years looking for the best. The Second movement here is also superb with tension & amazingly well-remastered sound everywhere on the disc. It is tense, & exciting, as is the first movement. My only disappointment is in the occaisionally slow, Wagnerian sounding 3rd movement, which reminds me of a Mahler, not a Beethoven symphony. Also, there are some too-slow tempos sometimes in the first movement. But this is still one of the best ever. Though Karajan also does a good job, Karajan's is NOT as well-recorded as is this, with odd, unreal sounding timpani at times. I would also highly recommend the George Szell/RobertShaw/Cleveland version from the 60s; only a decade before this one from Solti, but as perfect as any I've heard yet."
Symphony Chorus.....
C. G. Pfeil | Ruidoso, NM USA | 08/18/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"I was a member of the chorus in this version of the Ninth. It was an amazing experience and am so excited to finally find it on CD. The orchestra, under Sir Solti's watch, was becoming something they had never experienced before. It was my extreme honor to sing with the group at that particular time and be around musicians like Solti and Hillis. My music was better for it."
Professional recommendation
Chen Chao Chen | 07/06/2000
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Everyone knows Beethoven's Ninth; everyone loves it. People believe it is almost the most impressive orchestral work that had ever sounded through human ears which, represents the peak of a certain period of music that we called Classical. Despite the splendidness of this work, there are always problems for seeking a representative recording of this. And there is no such a single disk of it that pleases me much, as long as I keep collecting it. The Furtwangler's version has the highest grade though, the connection between soloist and choral part is not as well-continuate as it could. George Szell's version seems has a pretty good choral team, but the female-voice part doesn't match the male-voice part well. Karajan's 1977 version did a nice jod on this point; however, this great conductor controlled the first movement too speedily which made the musical syntax unclear. The 1962 version did even faster, but the bass Berry did give people a really unforgettable impression. Yet Solti's this shining recording's only defect is on the bass; as for the whole performance, speed, and sounding effect, they are good in anyway. So far this is my personal favorite of Beethoven's Ninth and I strongly recommend this recording to people who are seeking a nice sample of Beethoven's Ninth, and of cause, for those who care about the sounding effect."