Vivaciously And With Feeling And Expression Throughout
Not Too Quickly And Very Songfully
Track Listings (7) - Disc #9
Somewhat Lively And With Deepest Feeling
Lively. March Tempo
Slow And Yearning; Tempo Of The First movement; Swiftly, But Not Too, And With Determination
Allegro
Scherzo: Assai vivace
Adagio sostenuto
Largo; Fuga; Allegro risoluto
Track Listings (8) - Disc #10
Vivace, ma non troppo, Adagio espressivo
Prestissimo
Tema; Molto cantabile & espressivo; Variazioni I-VI
Moderato cantabile, molto espressivo
Allego molto
Adagio ma non troppo; Arioso dolente; Fuga; Allegro, ma non troppo; L'istesso tempo di Arioso; L'inversione della Fuga
Maestoso, Allegro con brio ed appassionato
Arietta; Adagio molto semplice e cantabile
It's interesting that the great Beethoven sonata cycles areseldom the ones by the big-name virtuosos. Horowitz never attempted one. Neither did Rubinstein. Ashkenazy recorded them all, but with only partial success. Richte... more »r never managed all 32 works at one time, and Gilels died before completing his cycle. The most successful complete recordings--Schnabel, Kempff, Arrau, and Backhaus--are all by pianists with a solidly intellectual mindset, however powerful their technique. Goode joins this select company, turning in performances of uncompromising integrity and musical strength. Of course, his reputation as a musician's musician precedes him: here is a player sensitive to Beethoven's every nuance, presenting the composers thoughts with exemplary clarity and taste. This is the Beethoven cycle for the '90s. --David Hurwitz« less
It's interesting that the great Beethoven sonata cycles areseldom the ones by the big-name virtuosos. Horowitz never attempted one. Neither did Rubinstein. Ashkenazy recorded them all, but with only partial success. Richter never managed all 32 works at one time, and Gilels died before completing his cycle. The most successful complete recordings--Schnabel, Kempff, Arrau, and Backhaus--are all by pianists with a solidly intellectual mindset, however powerful their technique. Goode joins this select company, turning in performances of uncompromising integrity and musical strength. Of course, his reputation as a musician's musician precedes him: here is a player sensitive to Beethoven's every nuance, presenting the composers thoughts with exemplary clarity and taste. This is the Beethoven cycle for the '90s. --David Hurwitz
"I have found that when approaching so substantial a body of work as Beethoven's piano sonatas, it is useful to have at least one complete set to serve as a reference, an anchor if you will, to bring coherence to the whole. Sometimes it is difficult to get the big picture when listening to several artists interpreting different sonatas. And in approaching Beethoven's piano sonatas, especially as a complete cycle, it seems a bit silly to start debating whether this set or that is the "best". When you have complete cycles and/or substantial recordings from every A-list pianist from Artur Schnabel to Daniel Barenboim, the questions really not which is "best" but whose approach is most suited to your tastes.Richard Goode's set is firmly classical (as opposed to romantic) in all ways, including the sound of the piano (emphasizing the pianoforte aspects of the instrument). So if you are looking for playing that emphasizes the wilder, revolutionary aspects of the music, this is not the set for you. Goode chooses instead to emphasize the music's heritage (and debt) to Haydn and Mozart by concentrating on line and structure. To put it another way, Goode chooses to look backwards for inspiration, rather than forwards. As my own personal tastes favor the classical to the romantic, his approach suits me perfectly.Personally, I find this set most satisfying. And while several other reviewers here seem to feel this set is somewhere between boring and awful, it should be noted that Gramophone, The Penquin Guide and The Rough Guide all consider this to be one of the best sets in recent years. Does this mean I no longer listen to Brendel, Schnabel, Jando, O'Conor or Gieseking? Absolutely not, nor will it keep me from buying some Solomon, Gilels and Kempff as the mood strikes me. The point is that I have an anchor, and a pretty good one at that."
Transparent, consistent and beautifully recorded
Ian Muldoon | Coffs Harbour, NSW Australia | 12/29/2002
(5 out of 5 stars)
"My favourite interpreter of these works remains Daniel Barenboim and his first complete cycle, though I have had much pleasure over the years from Mr Arrau and Mr Brendel. With Barenboim I found a joy and energy so why Mr Goode? I find that Mr Goode seems to bring less "personality" to his interpretation in that he seems to intrude less between the music and the listener and I get the impression the music is speaking directly to me. This may be a nonsense as I am not a musician myself, nor have I studied music. In addition, I believe the piano on this recording sounds sweeter, and more round with no idiosynchratic effects emphasised by recording techniques. I use a Meridian 506 CD player through a quality Australian made Hi Fi system. Finally, I find there is a satisfying constency of excellence between the early and late sonatas even though there will be times where I might prefer Mr Brendel's playing of, for example, Opus 109, though I find Mr Goode's playing of Opus 2 Number 3 perhaps beyond compare - again, a matter of taste. Let me just say in concluding, I cannot imagine being without Mr Goode's Beethoven sonatas after living with them over the past year.
An essential purchase."
A Novice's Opinion
Damian C. Smith | Salt Lake City | 03/21/2000
(5 out of 5 stars)
"This is the view of a novice who just loves Beethoven. I don't pretend to know the musical ins and outs of things, and frankly don't even understand what some reviewers are saying. My only qualification is that I love these Beethoven Sonatas better than about any other classical music, and I play a few of them myself as well. I also have bought a couple of other sets of the Beethoven Sonatas, so I have some basis for comparison. For my money, Richard Goode's set is the best, start to finish, that I have heard. I enjoy his clean, precise and effortless style. He doesn't not use excessive pedal, and the music is never mushy or indistinct. The dynamic variations and interpretations are always interesting--I never tire of hearing them. Goode's virtuosity on some passages is positively thrilling. The recording quality is excellent. If I had to keep just one set, this is my choice."
Easily the reference set of Beethoven sonatas
Daniel Graser | Wappingers Falls, New York United States | 01/15/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"There is no way that I could tell you about each of the performances in this set individually, but I can tell there wasn't one that I did not enjoy. For a long time now, Brendel's set has been the has been the one against which all others are compared, Goode has put an end to that. Richard Goode has officially produced the best all around set of Beethoven sonatas ever. The reason is simple. He doesn't go into the sonatas with a concept of how he's going to play them. He treats them all as they should be, different. He plays everything that Beethoven wrote, and then adds to it which is something that is becoming less popular in piano performance. He plays all of the composer's ornaments, articulations, and dynamic changes exactly as they are written, and then adds his personal touch. The result is a consistently beautifully played Beethoven set where the performer is playing masterfully but never getting in the way of the music. In this set we get the most intense Beethoven (He plays the Hammerklavier like no other) as well as the most meditatively serene. Shop around for different ones, but eventually I guarantee you will come back to Goode. Highest Recommendation"
Some Goode some bad
Ian Muldoon | 06/20/1999
(3 out of 5 stars)
"I have had this set for nearly two years and am still in two minds on how to regard it, feeling that I fall somewhere in between the reviews already written. Some is good and some seems (to me) to be bad. Firstly, I do not like the recorded sound at all. It is very close, dry and dull-sounding with none of the brightness in the upper range which I prefer (and I have to add that Goode's own vocal intrusions, his grunting and snuffling, are annoying at times). The early sonatas are too rigid and ungiving but the middle sonatas are mostly great. The 'Appasionata', especially in the finale, makes Gilel's sound earth-bound and Goode relishes the opportunity for virtuosity. The coda at the conclusion is played with stunning power and precision. The opening movement of op.106 is impressive but I always feel that he doesn't give it that total commitment of strength and power which it demands but while listening to the slow movement of the same sonata it is difficult to imagine it played any better...ever. Here the fluidity of the musical ideas are expressed with a great understanding of the ebb and flow of the music and the pools of musical stasis are even more effective when juxtaposed with the often declamatory and passionate interpretation of the main themes. The finale is similarly outstanding, sweeping the listener along on an extraordinary musical journey with barely a moment's pause. The ferocity and passion of the fugal texture is brilliantly realised. Op. 109 is not subtle enough, especially when compared with Kovacevich in the same piece but op.110 repairs the damage. The account of the last movement is simply great; listen to the repeat of the elegiac theme which returns after the first exposition of the fugue...Goode seems to conjure the music out of the depths of despair. In Op.111 the first movement is a titanic display of power and dramatic interpretation and the last movement reaches a suitably ethereal conclusion. This set is well worth considering, but Kempf may be an alternative consideration. The other alternative is to collect the sonatas seperately - my own personal feeling is that Kovacevich's on-going cycle (EMI) will be the one to collect in the coming years."