Kyrie: Duet (Soprano - Mezzo-Soprano): Christ, Have Mercy On Us.
Kyrie: Chorus: Lord, Have Mercy On Us.
Gloria: Chorus: Glory Be To God On High.
Gloria: Chorus: And On Earth Peace To Men Of Good Will.
Gloria: Aria (Soprano): We Praise Thee; We Bless Thee; We Adore Thee; We Glorify Thee.
Gloria: Chorus: We Give Thee Thanks For Thy Great Glory.
Gloria: Duet (Soprano - Tenor): Lord God, Heavenly King, God The Almighty Father. O Lord, The Only-Begotten Son, Jesus Christ, Most High Lord God, Lamb Of God, Son Of The Father.
Gloria: Chorus: Thou Who Takest Away The Sins Of The World, Have Mercy Upon Us. Thou Who Takest Away The Sins Of The World, Receive Our Prayer.
Gloria: Aria (Alto): Thou Who Sittest At The Right Hand Of The Father, Have Mercy Upon Us.
Gloria: Aria (Bass): For Thou Alone Art The Holy One. Thou Alone Art The Lord. Thou, Jesus Christ, Alone Art The Most High.
Gloria: Chorus: With The Holy Ghost In The Glory Of God The Father. Amen.
Track Listings (15) - Disc #2
Credo: Chorus: I Believe In One God.
Credo: Chorus: I Believe In One God, The Father Almighty...
Credo: Duet (Soprano - Mezzo-Soprano): All In One Lord Jesus Christ...
Credo: Chorus: And Was Incarnate By The Holy Ghost Of The Virgin Mary And Was Made Man.
Credo: Chorus: And Was Crucified Also For Us Under Pontius Pilate...
Credo: Chorus: And The Third Day He Rose Again According To The Scriptures...
Credo: Aria (Bass): And I Believe In The Holy Ghost...
Credo: Chorus: I Acknowledge One Baptism For The Remission Of Sins.
Credo: Chorus: And I Look For The Ressurection Of The Dead...
Sanctus: Chorus: Holy, Holy, Holy Lord God Of Hosts...
Sanctus: Chorus: Hosanna In The Highest.
Sanctus: Aria (Tenor): Blessed Be He That Cometh In The Name Of The Lord.
Sanctus: Chorus (da capo): Hosanna In The Highest.
Agnus Dei: Aria (Alto): Lamb Of God...
Agnus Dei: Chorus: Grant Us Peace.
One of the most frequently mentioned "favorite" works of Bach, the B Minor Mass is not really a functional liturgical work, but an assemblage of movements written over a period of many years. Its grand scale is certainly... more » awesome, but its musical and spiritual unity is more remarkable, considering its origin and the fact that it contains several different compositional styles--not to mention some of Bach's most profound and beautiful music. Performing this work and preserving a sense of its grand design while bringing out the considerable musical details is a challenge that most choirs, orchestras, and conductors are not up to. Almost by consensus, however, John Eliot Gardiner's version is the most successful--and it is indeed a phenomenal recording--at once sumptuous and penetrating, with gorgeous choral and solo singing, and spacious, vibrant sound. --David Vernier« less
One of the most frequently mentioned "favorite" works of Bach, the B Minor Mass is not really a functional liturgical work, but an assemblage of movements written over a period of many years. Its grand scale is certainly awesome, but its musical and spiritual unity is more remarkable, considering its origin and the fact that it contains several different compositional styles--not to mention some of Bach's most profound and beautiful music. Performing this work and preserving a sense of its grand design while bringing out the considerable musical details is a challenge that most choirs, orchestras, and conductors are not up to. Almost by consensus, however, John Eliot Gardiner's version is the most successful--and it is indeed a phenomenal recording--at once sumptuous and penetrating, with gorgeous choral and solo singing, and spacious, vibrant sound. --David Vernier
"I own three different versions of Bach's "Mass in B Minor," and have listened to several others. This is without doubt the best version of this sacred masterpiece I've ever heard! The English Baroque Soloists, under the direction of John Eliot Gardiner, play brilliantly on period instruments, and The Monteverdi Choir and vocal soloists sing with tremendous warmth, freshness and vitality. The sound quality, as is usual for the Deutsche Grammophon label, is outstanding. Perhaps this version's strongest attribute is the wonderful spiritual quality with which it is played and sung, a reverence for the sacred which shines through in every measure. It makes this CD set a very special listening experience for me, and I'm sure it will do the same for any lover of Bach's music."
Still unsurpassed
05/28/2001
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Gardiner has recently gone out of favor among some followers of period instrument bands, maybe because of his famous tyrannical temperament. More than a few critics were happy when the recording project of his laudable Bach Cantata Pilgrimage was cut by DG. That's ok. But the fact is, more than a decade later, Gardiner's recordings of Bach's major sacred works are still at the top of the pile, and the Mass in B minor may be the most evident example.Despite some nice later recordings, particularly Hickox's and Herreweghe's, Gardiner's still stands out as the more passionately committed one. Being a predominantly choral work, the Mass in B minor benefits immensely from the extraordinary singing of Gardiner's Monteverdi Choir. And Gardiner's option of using solo voices in some choral parts, as in the first Kyrie, the Et in terra pax and the Crucifixus, add a more intimate dimension which nicely contrasts with the more extrovert passages, where Gardiner shines as usual, with brilliant trumpets and fervourous singing.Of course, the Mass has also some extraordinary solo pieces, and Gardiner's soloists excel, as the playing of the English Baroque Soloists does. But it's the choirs that really make the difference. And here Gardiner's control of dynamics, rhythm and articulation is unsurpassed. He can draw the most vibrant singing from his choir without making it sound forced, without losing textural clarity.I tried to look for other recordings of this masterpiece. Harnoncourt disappointed, Brüggen was only ok, Parrott was intriguing, Hickox was excelent, Herreweghe was a joy. But I always find myself going back to the same Gardiner recording over and over again."
My Opinion In Brief
Marcolorenzo | Italy | 09/20/2006
(4 out of 5 stars)
"The Choral singing is stunning and glorious, unfortunately the soloists are not at the same level (sometimes unbelievably the quality is without real feeling or technical perfection or good tone color, in the soloist parts). The overall feeling of this recording is one of icy silvery clarity without intimate warmth and sometimes almost amateurish solo singing. Buy it for the choral singing with period instruments.
The situation concerning the existing recordings of Bach's B Minor Mass is according to me as follows:
Gardiner (ARCHIV): Period instruments version: Choral singing glorious and stunning soloists of much lesser quality and overall feeling very icy and cold.
Herreweghe (HARMONIA MUNDI): Period instrument version. Choral singing is sometimes weak and without great emotional envolvement. Solo singing often of exceptional intense feeling, especially the duet 'Et in unum dominum' (Zomer /Scholl) and the Agnes Dei (Scholl). Often bright brisk tempi,counterpuntal lines clearly demarcated although the back and forth dynamics between the counterpuntal lines it not well done. The overall feeling of this recording is of a warm meditative almost monastic medieval quality, which is not appropriate in my opinion to this great late Baroque work, but which is all the same very pleasing and beautiful and will put you in a state of contemplative rest,an example of how great this Bach work is that it can support so many various interpretations. Buy it for the solo singing.
Klemperer (EMI): Modern instruments. Very slow tempi, often grave and oftentimes too solemn, interpretated as a liturgical work, that is as a mass, which it really is not. (The work as a whole was never labeled as a Mass by Bach, only the earlier Kyrie and Gloria parts were.) The title Mass is a later 19th century publisher's addition since he saw that it was written to the words of the mass. This work is more like a sacred opera, a glorious final statement by Bach praising God and a synthesis of his whole life and of the many perceding periods of musical history. Janet Baker is excellent especially in the Agnes Dei, also the Benedictus is splendid. Buy it if you want a liturgical prayerful intrepretation
Jochum (EMI): Modern instruments.Choral singing splendid at or above the level of the Gardiner recording, all soloists are of exceptional quality, and sing with great warmth and feeling. There are moments when it makes your spine tingle. Performed by a man of great Christian faith and it shows in this interpretation. All things considered it is the best version available, if you can overlook the slightly fussy feeling (but ever so slightly) that the modern instruments create. Buy it if you want one almost perfect modern instrument version.
Rilling (HANNSLER): Modern instruments. It's a toss up between the Jochim version and this splendid version, which one to consider the best. Here the advantage over the Jochum version is that although it's a modern instrument version it is performed by a Bach expert who well knows the differences between a modern instrument version and a period performance and the instuments sound very much like period instruments at the right moments, at musically graphic points and like modern ones at the moments which require fuller tone color(how he did it I really don't know) The solists are a slight notch down compared with the Jochim version. The overall sound is clearer and more transparent than the Jochim version. Buy it if you want one almost perfect modern/period version, with minor flaws in the solo singing.
The Bach B minor Mass is probably the greatest work of music ever written by one of the greatest musicians of Western music and therefore no one version can do this masterpiece justice. It is extremely complex and difficult chorally and architecturally. Here however is on a Scale of 1 to 10 how I would rate the situation:
Jochum 9.7
Rilling 9.6
Herreweghe 9.2
Gardiner 9.0
Klemperer 8.8
"
High Quality, but...
Rob Hahn | Phoenix, AZ | 10/02/2002
(3 out of 5 stars)
"I love this piece of music, so I decided to buy this CD, my second version of the Bach mass. I am not sorry I bought it, but like others have said, I am beginning to think that there is no "perfect" recording of this masterpiece. There are beautiful aspects to this recording: crystal clear sound quality, crisp but lush strings, lively tempos. The energy behind "Cum Sancto" and "Gloria in Excelcis" is nothing short of breathtaking. But... there is missing pathos in the first Kyrie. The "Christe" is not plaintive enough. I guess no recording will ever do justice to Bach's incredible accomplishment. His achievement is as much in the mind as it is in the sound of the performers. If you don't own a recording of the Bach Bm, by God buy one right away! This one or any other! But if you are trying to decide which one to buy, this one is good for lovers of clear sound, energy, and vitality. More melancholic, introspective, and angst-filled listeners should turn to other recordings."
Not my cup of tea
Arnout Koeneman | the netherlands | 05/20/2006
(3 out of 5 stars)
"This is a fine performance.
For many people their favorite Mass in B.
For me the least favorite of the recordings I own.
The choir and orchestra are excellent, the solo singers are great, but I don't like Gardiner's conducting that much.
The music moves in rhythmic measured blocks and has a somewhat English character...I don't know other way to descripe it, but Handel would fare well with it.
The choir often sings staccato where legato or at least less measured and clipped singing is requiered, therefore it sounds too earthy at times
Gardiner's tempo choices are somewhat odd, for instance the aria Laudames te is way too quick and again wih a rhythmic measured base, it is not difficult to imagine a remix by a dj who adds a beat under the music...Gardiner sounds just like that.
The recording is good and spacious but with little substance, the sound is too distant and small, with very little timbre and texture.
It reminds me of the Christophers with the Sixteen recording, although that one is even worse, you can crank up the volume with no effect, it remains small...and the sound becomes harsh.
But Christopher's reading is much better than Gardiner's, if the sound was somewhat bigger and with more substance that one would maybe one of my favorites
For now Herreweghe's first recording is still my favorite, it has warmth, intimacy and personality and the polish of the choir which is a little timid at times gives it a divine, mystical quality.
Gardiner is more extrovert but also more objective, it seems he lacks Herreweghe's spiritual involvement.
Another "winner" would be Fasolis' recording, not as "sacred" as Herreweghes, but very sincere...(ahum, I don't no other way to put it, ofcourse Gardiner is sincere too)
Excellent recording and with more atmosphere and intimacy than Gardiner and Christophers (but in Christophers case the recording is to blame).
Still regardless my reservations towards Gardiner's approach his performance is superb in every sense and Gardiner's way is legitimate.